Enos Schlabodnic Is a Whistle Blower!

I never thought I've see Rush Limbaugh being an advocate for the Left, and particularly for the consumer class, but that's just what he was on his show today.  It's no secret that I regard Barock Hussein Obama as a major political sell-out or more to the point "cave-in" like those sink holes in Florida.  What about those sink holes in Florida, huh- - there was one that swallowed up a whole resort just next to Disney World- - where a - get this - - a hole sixty feet wide by fifteen feet deep just opened up out of nowhere within minutes.  The only warning the people inside the resort had was that windows began spontaniously shattering, and those in the know told everybody in the building to get out quickly and don't even try to round up your belongings.  People couldn't get out because doors were jammed and they had to break windows.  Well President Obama is sitting over a gigantic political sink hole and he doesn't know it.  Rush Limbaugh already pointed out how Congress has carved out a nice little nitch exception for themselves as far as the Affordable Care Act goes.  Because they wanted 75% coverage- or maybe 75% coverage wasn't enough for them, I don't know.  At any rate,  these politicians wanted to make sure they weren't among the first guinea pigs to try out Obama Care for real. But then we had the delay of the employer mandate.  Rush today said that employers all over were heeving a sign of relief over that one.  Because now there wouldn't be that "job killing machine" in operation just before next year's elections.  Unfunded mandates are such a pain in the ass.  But today yet another shoe of this hybred monster known as the Affordable Care act just dropped.  Now the Obama is taking the "Affordable" out of the Affordable Care Act.  That was supposedly the whole idea.  Of course apparently you could always "just pay the fine" and say screw the whole thing.  But generally the idea was for people to go to the exchanges and buy health care coverage.  Only now, and this is according to Rush- - they are saying that there will be certain "out of pocket expenses", which the patient will have to pay- - (Rush claims all of his medical bills are "Out of Pocket" expenses) - - and also the deductables will be jacket up sky high- - and this is all to save the insurance companies money - or perhaps to save the government money or both - - to keep the Federal Deficet down just before next year's election.  There will be caps on coverage just as their are now.  So change that slogan to "We definitely Don't have you covered".  So we'll have to live with those high deductables come next year, and all those rosey reports you were hoping to give next year- - may be with the stroke of the pen of an executive order- - all that expected monetery relief just flew right out the window.

Yesterday and today, Randy Rhodes was playing this Keith Oberman tape from a broadcast right after the Citizens United ruling.  Apparently it was a little Too Much Truth for MSNBC because Keith Oberman was first right after that.  Keith gave one of these departing presidential warnings in the tradition of Eisenhower - - warning that now that non humans were accorded as much "personhood status' as actual people- - that there would be the strong brother of the Corporations and the Wesker brother, the languishing one, of the Labor Unions.  And no way can Labor possible match the truckload of funds that the Corporation can back a truck up to the Capital and start dumping money all over the place.  So the lesson here is to watch for an all out attack on the Labor Unions to put them out of business so that nobody on the Left benefits from the Citizen's United Ruling.  And we are to expect a purge of the overall "nuts" of the Town Hall meetings- - which hopefully will be obsolete by now- - and we won't have to mess with the more obviously mentally disturbed nuts like the extreme racists, or the birthers- - - or the UFO conspiracy nuts- - - and maybe Glen Beck is he "gets out of line".   And expect to see continued wars because these will take on the glow of "A new product roll out" like the latest Apple I Phone, only it will be the latest international conflict where Haliburten and Blackwater and the Koch Brothers can make their Billions.  Of course now there is a new line that's being employed- - and I heard it from Judy last year.  Expect an all out attack on the very term "Middle Class".  This is a term to be disparaged because these people will return to the whole Log Cabin myth- - that you, like Abraham Lincoln can be born in a humble log cabin and grow up to be President.  Hence people like Judy expect us to take seriously the notion that "Bringing people out of poverty into the middle class" is somehow an injury to these people and to the "American Spirit" because after all America is a "Classless Country".  That's what they are saying.  We don't talk of race.  Why we don't have a racist bone in our bodies!  And we don't believe in Class either.  We're Americans.  We believe in "The human spirit".  They think "The human spirit" will lift the masses out of poverty.  Randy Rhodes points out that Marxism also taught the idea of a "Classless society".  It didn't work in Russia for seventy years, so why the hell would the tea party crowd think it would ever work or become a reality in This country.  It's nuts!  I'll tell you what's important.  Bigger and bigger profit revenues.  And if the poor get in our way we'll just have to raid their pension funds and their strike funds and whatever else they have managed to squerrel away of their meager, hard earned posessions.  These people won't be happy untill they get it all.  And they're a lot closer to that eventuality now than they were fifteen years ago, but their greed and discontent only grows- - until some Power out of Somewhere is able to stop them.

Of course, to quote a former house mate of mine, "There's power in Secrets".  But if the political Left can't keep whatever winning strategy they come up with a secret- - all their hopes for victory next year may be all for naught anyhow.  Of course the tea party right claims to know our "Master Plan".  Now these fevered minds are saying that President Obama WANTS the affordable care act to fail so that the American people will clammor for and get Single Payer health care.  You have always heard the political right speak of the "incrementalism of the left".  This is a really strange charge to make in that - this President has "suffered death from a thousand paper cuts".  No matter how slight the Presidents "departure" from - - what the Right considers 'normal and proper" behavior for a President, these tea baggers are going to raise bloody hell about it and say "That's an impeachable offense".  Hence this President is almost afraid of his own shadow.  Hence the idea that - - any scenario like Jennifer Horton and Jack Jr. or the idea of "getting away with something" and then the other side "gets used to that trespass" and so the protagonist ups the anti a bit and does something "incrementally" more daring.  As you can see this sort of behavior- - even if attempted- would not work at all for this President in the political climate of today.  Well you know what they called General Mc Lellon during the civil war, don't you?  The Virginia Creeper.  I guess it was some local insect or gecko or something.  Anyhow it was a term of disparagement.  It was in effect saying "General Mc Lellon can't get the job done and it's time for Lincoln to fire him and get someone in there who Can - - get the job done, and advance the battle front at a faster pace.  My philosophy is "Never PLAN on moving at glacial speed".  If it happens maybe you can't help it but never Plan on that.  This whole Incrementalism thing just leaves me cold.  Copping such an attitude would insure that you lost in any chess match.  This Object Lesson was demonstrated in today's soap opera where Elvis Di Mira arranged to have some money "planted" on a cop they said was "dirty".  I know that's just a Story but even as it was happening I had this inescapable feeling something wouldn't go right.  And of course I was correct.  (Soap opera writers would be bad chess players because you can read them like a book)  Well somehow the Enemy got wind of this 'secret strategy" and was able to defeat the plan.  That's what I'm worried about.  In Ten Commandments lingo it's fear of all the Dathans out there with their snooping eyes and ears.  They are apparently everywhere.  It would seem that even if you're willing to bend the law a bit and be Sneaky - - there is someone else out there who will be even more Cleaver and Sneaky and Quicker than you are and who will defeat you at your own game.  This little paragraph is just a little Word to the Wise- - to Whom it may concern.

Let's talk about prostitutes and johns for a bit.  Sometimes the cop poses as the John - - in order to lure in some woman on Prostitution charges and take her in.  Other times the cops pose as the Prostitute - - and believe you these women practically reach out and grab you and drag you into bed with them.  So which is it?  Who are they most wanting to get off the Streets?   Here's a moral question.  Can a desire to Sell something be morally justifiable but the one who Buys it is morally corrupt?  I'll let you muse on that question for a second.  Suppose you want to unload a business because you are retiring or wanting to shed the family farm because you are too old to work it and you can't get good hired help and all of your children have moved to the city?  Should such a couple be saddled with High Capital Gains Taxes if they wish to sell the farm to get some retirement money?  I argue that they should Not.  That's why I said nothing about raising the current 15% sales tax figure in my economic treaties. But now here is where me and the tea party part company.  But what about the big Corporate buyer who wants to buy out a farm, or worse yet some new invention that is struggling to find its way on the Market.  Should one who would seek to Buy them out- - be forced to Pay more in taxes- - in the form of a Sales Tax.  You see a sales tax is really a Buyers tax and not a Sellers tax.  I argue that such a Big Corporation should- - pay up big for the privelege of such a transaction.  This was one of the key points in my economic plan of a few weeks ago I just wanted to clarify.  Some of the Math stuff we do is pretty far out.  For instance as you know we proposed a different Base E number- - one that the Federation uses.  The psychology behind this is simple.  It's the mystical relation between Two and Three.  You ask "Why would anyone want to depart from a mathematically "ideal" number?  I can give you an excellent example.  Because you can use a nutritional analogy.  We told you about your typical "Hatch Back" Base E graph line- - the Wikkipedia has a similar such graph line that is different from ours.  The far right of the line is the top of the roof of the car- - represents Base and Exponent parody and as the ratio between the two increases- - this number of "parody" decreases.  That is- the figure you need for Base and Exponent parody decreases with the increase of the Ratio.  It would be like nutrition and the needs of the human body.  Some people say you need five thousand Units of Vitamin D per day.  One company says you need fifty thousand units per day.  Let's suppose the fifty thousand figure is the maximum amount your body can tollerate before you get sick or something or develope Vitamin D toxisity.  Now the original Base E number used by scientists today is based on that maximum fifty thousand figure.  We at the Federation back it off a bit saying "Well let's just go with 35,000 Units per day rather than fifty.  So the Federation Base E figure is 2.646 and the normal figure everybody else uses is 2.718  - - I think.  We believe ours is more useful, particularly for twos and threes.

One source describes the theologian Marcion "A rich fat cat making a long trek to Rome far from his shipping business on the Black Sea.  In terms of Marcion's Gospel of Luke not only is the Christmas story omitted, but Jesus being baptized by John the Baptist is omitted.  When Jesus comes to Nazareth, the words "where he had been brought up" do not appear in this text.  The circumstances of the Death of John the Baptist is also much more sparsely referred to.  Jesus utters the line about John, "Behold he is blessed, if he will not be offended by me".  That sounds a little combative.  There is no indication the two ever met.  In the story of the transfiguration mount experiance it says that the Desciples fell asleep and when they woke up they saw Elijah and Moses with Jesus.  In a rare bit of "revelation" there is a text when Jesus is talking about the tribulation period where he says "Pray to God that you will be counted worthy".  Which is all and well, but traditional scripture adds the words " - - to escape all these things".  Also the reference to Jesus forgiving mankind from the cross has a strange bracket reference.  Also the three women did not see Jesus on Easter morning but only angels, and their words seemed as nonesense to the desciples. Although Jesus invited the desciples to gaze upon him- -the reference to their physically touching his body is omitted.  Also the scene where Jesus goes to the Mount of Olives and ascends to heaven in a cloud is omitted.