"Just What Does He Mean By That?"

Behold in a world where the blind lead the blind, the world is very different, which to a sighted man appears madness. Behold paupers exchange gifts. Of what value are these to the rich. “You’re very well read, it’s well known”. Dylan spoke these words, perhaps in a song meant for me, as one who never quite seems to know what is really going on. “Look out kid; they keep it all hid”. Many people who turn to religion gorge themselves on “Useless and pointless knowledge”. Such people are spiritually dead, but their tombstones do look nice. In “Beneath the Planet of the Apes” people speak to each other’s minds. Behold when we “share each other’s minds” the Kingdom of Heaven will have arrived. Behold the elite know how to generate delusions with their thoughts at others, and as such the strong subjugate the weak to do their wills. A God will not defend himself is like a soldier who lays down his weapon in the heat of battle. Such should be summarily taken out and shot. In the movie Dune the spice is king. Religion is like spice. A little in proper balance controls the humor balance of the body and improves the tastes of the things they consume. Too much religion is like too much spice. The counter-productivity of such an action is Self Evident. In the Federation only the Priests have entrusted to them the psychic powers. Such is the nature of a photograph that overexposure ruins the picture and actually decreases the resolution thereof. Darkness has its place in a Universe because God in his wisdom permitted it as part of his creative genious. Many seek a deliveror but whether they actually need one is best left to God rather than the seeker. People who seek an answer and don’t find one, gain wisdom if they don’t allow ambition to shave their prince’s lock of hair. Optical images come in two forms- - real and apparent. So it is with Time. Real Time is caused by gravity. Apparent time is that thing where God gives you leave to act on his word once you have heard it. People in the see of green see submarines going backwards. It doesn’t really what direction you are headed in this place, except if you’re only a visitor. In the sea of green, thoughts are things. Count yourself lucky that what others can’t buy, is yours for free. Behold: do the dead seek a body to live in or merely an “Off” switch? Atomic particles are governed by their own set of micro forces. He who understands how the sixth dimension interacts with other known dimensions is like he who reigns blazing in the sky at noon. Behold no other can rival him. Knowing the future is like gaining knowledge on the internet. All you need is a working modem. Bringing a person to “Now” is the salvation of their soul. People in the past know their place is in the past, and so it is with the future. But people in the present know not that God is always watching them. People who are “Brought to NOW” know that they are in God’s presence. If you are in God’s presence, nothing else can harm you. (Selah)

FOURTEEN "SATANIC VERSES"

Behold after the wise men presented their gifts the young child Jesus opened up his mouth and spoke. He said “You know I am sent here not to deliver Israel but to preside over its damnation and destruction. For I know all things from the beginning including every prayer that will be answered and unanswered. For all the Jews are a bunch of spiritual bastards and spawn of Satan and will be destroyed

Jesus as a young child time after time witnessed brawling conversations between his bickering parents talking about the way he might or might not have been conceived. If speculation about this bothered Jesus, he didn’t let on.

One day when Jesus was about eleven he witnessed Roman legions storming his beloved city of Nazareth. He had a conversation with a Roman trooper who said, “You know kid, the future is Roman. You Jews will never win by taking up arms against us.” From then on it was burned in Jesus memory to be only for Peace.

One day Jesus met Judas. As the others asked questions of Jesus , Jesus stared Judas right in the eye and said, “A tree is known by it’s fruit. Remember that”. At this time Judas said “Suffice to accept me for now”.

One day a man came up to Jesus who’s wife was slowly dying from an internal hemmerage. Jesus said “I will heal your wife on the condition that you give up your opium habbit. If you do this I will answer your prayer”.

Jesus said, “Many want to know what to do to enter the Kingdom of Heaven. Varily I tell you that he who drinks my blood and eats my flash shall share in my atonement for sin, and upon death will ender those pearly gates”.

Jesus said to the thief on the cross, “Your words show sincerety but if sincerety mattered we wouldn’t be here. Your fate is up to the whims of God”.

When before King Hered one of Herod’s demands was “Make it thunder”, and behold it thundered so loud Herod fell to his feet and became as a dead man. And he looked up to Jesus and said “What must I do Lord to repent”. Jesus said, “Thow already knowest”. From that moment on Herod set Jesus free.

When Jesus was with the prison guards they put a bag over his head planning to hit him blindfolded and ask “Prophisy for us, who hit you”. But behold every time they were about to hit him he jerked out of the way, almost as if he knew. Many of the guards exclaimed “Surely this man is a prophet”.

When Jesus was in Jerusalem preaching to them and suffering many verbal accusations, Jesus said “If you say one more railing thing against me I shall expose the filth and hypocracy of each and every one of you”. He stared into their eyes and they knew he’d just do it and they said, “We cannot say where we get our authority from, but this we know- - - that your authority comes from God”.

After the death of Jesus’ father, he was never the same again. He had a personal existential crisis of what Life was all about. And he began saying to people knowing his father was in the ground, “Behold I have no more an earthly father but from hence forth shall seek the will of my heavenly father”.

Jesus said to his disciples on the mount of olives, “Behold many will say the antichrist is at the gates, even in the temple. But I say unto you there will henceforth be no temple to defile, and I declare this prophecy that worries you disciples so as utterly false”.

Jesus said to the crouds, “Behold if you had the faith of a grain of mustard, you could say to the Law of God, “Die” and it would die, along with its precepts and oaths and promises. Behold I tell you that the day of such faith is upon us”.

When some of the women reported that they had seen an angel at the tomb saying Jesus would see them in Galilee, the disciples said, “Behold we have fled for our lives and at our own peril would we return to the city of Jerusalem. We will take your advice, that is, in a matter of speaking. Our Lord is dead and it is unseemly to dwell or fantasize on this but to get on with our lives”.

RENDEZVOUS WITH HELL

I learned another song, “Beechwood Park” by the Zombies. There are three times they have stuck Zeppelin songs from the seventies on Sixties Rock. We had chicken patties and potatoes and gravy for dinner and I had an additional half patty. I went out to the bakery for coffee. What I’d like to talk about I’m going to be cryptic about. There is nothing cryptic about the phone call I just got. I’m so mad I’m shaking. I’m having trouble typing. Judy wanted to know that since I can’t get the twenty from the Trader Joe’s card, because I’m not supposed to have money, what else would I like? The second half of that sentence went right past me. I heard “You’re not supposed to have money” and thought, “OK they are so desperate to get me to quit smoking they’re cutting off my money supplies. I had to remind Judy that I never had problems from the mid seventies onward until a year and a half ago and it’s not exactly because I’ve been spending so much money lately. No doubt I emotionally overreacted to her but she pushed my buttons like considering what a geek I am for being on SSI - - I al well cared for. William Holden was “well cared for” in Sunset Blvd. too but in the price he lost his manhood. I don’t understand this Clintonesque “compartmentalization” that Christians are able to do when it comes to me and SSI. I not only resented the audit of early 2003 I resented the one in spring of 1997 and the financial stuff in March of 1992. I finally said yes I would like headphones for my computer. This is going to be one sick Christmas. The shadow of SSI will be hanging over it. I also reminded Judy of a letter I had just sent to the household that apparently she hasn’t seen.

Now back to my original topic. Sylvia Browne said something today that “pressed my buttons”. Why did it bother me? I’m not going to tell you what it is except in the bizarre case it actually happens and then I’ll say “Well, I predicted it right here except I never mentioned it by name”. It has to do with a decision that Mom made probably decades ago that is still overshadowing her. She has been dropping little hints. It was that poem that she read at the funeral- - and particularly the last line of it which I regard as delusional and from a Christianity stand point ill-advised, as well as contra-indicated by the words of Jesus Christ. Stewart Sutcliffe referred to it as a “Pact with the devil” but in this case it’s Satan’s idea to begin with. To quote from Hamlet “Tis unseemly”. “Unseemly” ideas are ones you want to put out of your mind. Other hints are things like this whole money thing with me and “disengagement” with me emotionally. Mom was going to get a computer two months ago. Now I don’t think there is a snowball’s chance in hades of that happening. I wrote Paul there were “different kinds of addicts”. From the Federation’s point of view Mom’s worst addiction I referred to in that letter- - - really isn’t her worst problem, as bad as it is. The line “I know your mind’s made up you’re gona cause more misory” comes to mind. I guess you could call it from my point of view a “primal fear of the future, the unknown”. I think Satan takes his contracts very seriously. Unlike Earthlink, Satan doesn’t have to “Collect” early; the date will be coming around soon enough as it is. After the book closes on our Fairy Tale story with the principles living unhappily ever after, Then What??? To quote Dylan “Where is the cause and what’s the reason for- - “ or something from Davie Moore. OK folks, that’s my Paul Harvey moment for today.

We are in sapphire right now. I believed we’ve only used this background once before. Today’s date is December 12, 2007. Ike Turner died. Like in the case of Marlon Brando, and years early Ricky Nelson, I believe I got some of the fall-out benefit of Ike’s guardian angels delivering messages about the hereafter and just giving you a fresh energy on life. Back in July of 2004 I was in a very loquatious mood on paper, with a lot of ideas. December 12^th. is also a day that was in a dream about a star in the sky that would suddenly get much brighter on this date and there was some religious group who annually looked to this event. As you know in terms of “revelations” I have seen in the spirit both Ike and Tina lounging on the beach on Reigel VI. Maybe this is occurring in some other fifth dimension. It is certainly Federation belief that Ike and Tina are kindred spirits, who share guardian angels. OH no. The phone is ringing once again- - - .

SOME CLOSING THOUGHTS

This is December 13, 2007, the anniversary of the date when the Federation says when Zachery was conceived, just before sunrise. I was already restless in bed this morning when the blood guy knocked on the door. It wasn’t Friday and it wasn’t the end of the month, but I guess Dracula must have been running low. I went out and smoked a cigarette and then I took a shower and went out and smoked another cigarette, and then I turned on the TV. It was the Golden Globe awards. (Obviously an award a Jewish man could never win) And the winner for best movie is- - -

The Great Mass-Debater

And this year’s winner of the Judas Iscariot Award is

Clowie Brady!

I’m not going to post a blog till after I’ve had breakfast and coffee and I’ll see how I feel then. I’ve thought of elaborating on what that big dread secret is that Sylvia Browne alluded to. You know, I think I’m still keeping my lips sealed. Sometimes in blogs people don’t know what is really going on with you. There’s the tip of the ice berg in the water up ahead. I can see Willy, or maybe it’s Scotty on the sailing vessel being tossed about by high waves and Willy says, “Captain, there is an irregularity of the waves up ahead. I deduce a giant ice berg up ahead. But you know, John Lennon went through his own Exestential Crisis back around 1968, 1969 and 1970. We know he couldn’t have been a happy camper during this period because he was mainlining heroin and nobody who does this is very happy. Perhaps he felt emasculated because Paul had ucerped his role as leader of the Beatles that he’d held for so many years. Perhaps it was unresolved edipal feelings upon the death of his mother. Perhaps Yoco Ono was Becoming his mother. You see this conceiled rage in the songs Lennon was writing, just as I’ve been conceiling a lot of personal rage when I write my blogs. Of course there’s the Bill Halliday trilogy on the White Album of “Bungalow Bill”, “While My Guitar Gently Weeps” and “Happiness is a warm gun”. That’s the feeling a redneck gets just after he’s made his first kill. The gun is still warm. Some may wonder who the “They” is in the lyric, “I don’t know how THEY perverted you”. People use words like They and Them out of fear, when they don’t care to elaborate what they really think. I assume you’ve listened to “Only a Pawn in Their Game” by Dylan. Of course there’s the “Julia riff” the guitar riff that pervades several John Lennon songs as well as several Pink Floyd songs. Nobody wants to be either Brain Damaged or Eclipsed.

N YVGGYR ZBER GUNA XVA

N YVGGYR YRFF GUNA XVAQ

Acting On False Motives

A lot of people in this country are phones. I guess corporate heads are phoneyer in their motives than even the rest of us are. We saw this when the rubber tire manufacturers like Firestone lobbied to get rid of the Red Line streetcar system in Los Angels and put up instead the choking web of Freeways and cars we have now. Apparently in the 1930's the cotton growers wanted to put the hemp manufacturers out of business and along with the paper and tree pulp industry lobbied congress to make marijuana possession and use illegal. Of course they wern't above stopping to the lowest of arguments to do so. It was said that if Black people smoked marijuana they sould be able to stare the white man down and not flinch in his presence. In congressional testimony it was said that marijuana would make white women sexually desire Black men. Marijuana was also responsible for jitterbug and bee-bop music of the black culture. We may look at all this as rather silly today. But not silly enough that we have repealed any marijuana laws. Because we are all subcontiously still running all those old "scripts" in our minds.

The role of "scripts" or a variation of what we call "en-grams" goes on a lot with people and I'll give you an example. Suppose I were to give you something I wrote called "Eternity- - a Difficult Concept" a lot of things would go through your mind that you are not even contiously aware of. Some of you would think of the end of the world. Or you would think of the Thousand Years of Peace talked about in the Book of Revelation, and also propigated by Adolph Hitler. You would think of some "end climax battle". Some people would think of Heaven which they see as this spirit realm you go when you die and death is the magic ticket that gets you there. Death is the "fairy dust" which transports you there. In this place you see God and Jesus and all your loved ones. If asked "Where is heaven" you can't say. It used to be up when we had a flat earth but now you just don't know. It's in your mind but it's also real, "If you believe". The harder you believe the sooner you'll get there. This is certainly a childish concept. People say "Child like" is good but "Child-ISH is bad". I don't know why. For my money the two words have identical meanings since "ish" means "like". Of course there's the tag line "- - and they lived happily ever after". That's a code name for "The end of the story". And that's just it. We think of stories having a beginning, a middle and an end. But don't ask what happens past the end. That's not part of the story. What about the day Sleeping Beauty hits menopause, and she gets hemeroids and wakes up with that twinge in her knee and knows she has arthritus? In like manner you aren't supposed to ask what Jesus did before he enters the Gospels at age thirty. The mere asking of the question is blasphamy to people like Jesus on KFI. It's "Not part of the story" so in effect doesn't exist, to think about one way or the other, any more than Prince Charming's getting lung cancer from hanging out with Sir Walter Rolleigh.

I say all this because when people think of the universe they think of a beginning, a middle, and an end. They're trapped in time. Maybe there is some Paradise out there waiting for them where things are perfect. It's funny how all the main religions have the same theme. First there is creation, then the fall by means of some corruption, which explains mans misory in life. Then tnere is some Savior who is doing so in Secret, which is why you have to believe in him. Chuck Smith speaks of death being like "Seeing the other side of the tapestry that's being woven by God and we just see the ugly under-side and not the finished product". The thing wrong with this is that it's just emotional imigry like the desire for "some grand conclusion" is an emotional one. You have to ask then, what is the loom, what is the loom weaver, what is the thread, ect. ect. The concept of some thing or process just "going on forever" eludes most people. They just can't conceive of it because they've been conditioned not to think that way.

Certain things Christians say are just plain wrong and I'll give you two examples. They love to talk about Sacrates' alligory of the cave. They look at the world of shadows and say "This isn't real, the outwide world is real, and that represents heaven after we die". Just to correct you the shaddow world is quite real. Shadow casting I imagine is a major division of solid geometry and projection. Projection of shadows on round objects is an even trickyer science. The action is very real and the more you know about it the smarter you are. Also someone might coment on the idea of waves on the ocean we talked about in the last post. I suppose the truth of it is that waves are set in motion by objects. But you don't know if it was a rock or a cell phone that was cast into a pond to make the ripples. A really smart person could tell you which. We have been saying that sixth dimensional reality is something we don't see now because we're still looking at the waves. Of course there is the rock or earthquake that set the waves in motion. There are varied kinds of waves. Electronics and sound use sine waves or waves that fluctuate around a median. Ocean waves have a different shape to them. Gravity warping of the universe could be akin to isobars on a weather chart often clumping in round loops. And sixth dimensional reality is like someone getting ready to tie a bow. I say all this because if someone is on the sixth dimension "seeing the rock before it was cast into the lake" that doesn't make the ripples any less real or damage from tidal waves any less real. This brings me to my other great truth which is that some say "Human life is basically meaningless and worthless in the grand scheme of things because it's so short in comparrison to- - - Eternity. Because it's so short therefore it's less real, they say. How does being short make human life any less real to the people in it? After all it's all we've got. It's the only reality we can be sure of. To assume anything beyond this life and hope and expect in it- - - is not alltogether rational. We said mankind falls into the trap of assuming creation and a middle and then an end or destruction. I got the idea from a Simpson's episode to construct a model of the Universe that didn't necessitate creation or destruction but an endless progression of black holes within black holes, like one of those Zoomquilt pattern things where you keep zooming. But people are locked into this belief that everything had to have a beginning, a middle, and an end, and the "And they lived happily ever after" phase to life. People's metaphysical concepts need to grow up out of childhood.

Contradictory Truths

If you are God and perceive everything perfectly that you see and experiance through the senses I guess you don't need to read this blog. A famous man once said that it's a sign of true intelligence in a human that he can hold two contradictry truths in his mind at the same time. Note I did not call this "Paradoxical truths", because these are just word play, such as, "What gets bigger the more you take away from it- - a hole". Some things aren't contredictory truths at all like those adds that used to say "Certs is a candy mint- - - Certs is a breath mint" or the "Less filling - - tastes Great" contraversey. I'm talking about something like everybody saying that Visual Basic was easier than QuickBasic. To my way of thinking visual basic is much harder in about every respect. But what "Visual" does is provide templates and short-cuts. They color code the program. Variables are in black, and program words are in blue, string variable values are in red, and comentary is in green and the label numbers are aqua. Also there is a thing in Visual where after you have used all their shortcuts you can see all the lengthly code you've generated. As an ex DBase plus user it's like opperating in "Assist" mode, which I rarely did, because it slowed me down. To my way of thinking it's alltogether "simpler" when you have sovreign control over everything. If you want to generate a Windows compatable program people will actually pay you money to produce, then go with Visual. Money isn't bad.

Is light a wave or a particle? People like Time-Life say it's both and that "visable light as a split personality". Well, the wave theory had pretty much one hundred percent been proven by the latter part of the nineteenth century. But then you have of course photons, which behave like particles, that are chargeless electrons. Also there is one medical program where they said that an X ray machine would "fry" your electronic device such as a cell phone. I wondered at this but then remembered Leo Le Port's talking about nutrinos from cosmic rays and how just one priticle could trip a computer bit from zero to one. Also I saw or read how longer wavelengths of light generate these nutrino particles once in a blue moon but with cosmic rays, every wave has a particle in it, that permiates lead and anything else, and according to Chuck Smith causes premature aging. So there is the wave - - particle duality.

Then there is a "fifth dimensional" contraversy we discussed a couple of Posts ago that the Federation people were debating among themselves. In a closed four-dimensional universe there would seem to be no place for a fifth dimension, especially an "unreality" dimension. When you're dealing with cosmological physics you have to keep certain truths in mind. A big one is that the nature of the space surrounding a piece of matter is determined by the nature of the particles that make up that specific matter. When the Big Bang occurred, and for perposes of argument we're assuming that it did- - nothing was defined- - neither the nature of matter nor the dimensions of space. Even the best scientists say that "dimensions were lost soon after the big bang". I maintain that the whole idea of "oblique" universes best illustrates the fifth dimension. That is - - if matter is almost like ours- - - maybe it's "off" only fractions of a degree from our own- - - then this universe is "mostly" foreward time, we we define foreward time. But suppose there is something we can't measure, like the human "soul" or "plasma energy" or even "thought energy" - - or anything else that we can't measure in our Universe at all, so has no substantive reality in this universe- - something like this may well be a perpendicular universe to ours. Of course you may ask "If it isn't measurable matter or exist in foreward time, how can we determine when and where it was created". Ah soo! You have discovered a truth. We may have to cope with things that were NOT "created" in our form of time. This reality of a fifth dimension may be argued itself in terms of Absolute or Relative. What we define as foreward time may be "sideways time" to this other perpendicular dimension. This is the pure relative view. "Foreward" having no absolute. Indeed under this view, "backwards" or anti-matter is just as relivant as foreward matter and time. I think it's pretty safe to assume that this anti-matter cannot exist in our forward time because it has its own "backward time" to exist in. I think the view the Federation takes is that there is a pure "forward time" and that any oblizue variant is just that: a varient from True Reality, which the Federation perports to represent. Then there is the question "If there is an absolute forward time- - - " are we in it or are we "skiewed" or "off" a bit and when Truth is revealed to us will our "reality" suddenly be wiped out by a Truer fifth dimensional reality that is right on- - at a non oblique angle?

The previous paragraph was pretty much review to our regular readers but I thought its truths were worth resstating at this time. Gene Scott talks about the "Geshtaldt" learning theory by wshich we learn truths by having them be repeated over and over. So if I were to watch more Visual Basic videos I might assume that subsequent ones would go over the same ground I've been exposed to but cover it in a bit different aspect and this time around I'd "get it".

Another contradictory truth is the whole immigration thing. As President I'd like to think I'd be like Mit Romney, you know, Mr. hard-ass tword the illegal aliens. I envision myself running on this type of platform. In this Thom Hartman eutopia employers who hired illegal aliens would be thrown in jail and states that allowed drivers licenses or free tuition to illegal alians would be the target of a ruthless vendetta by the Federal Government. I would campaign on such a platform because I see the necessity of these steps. But another truth is that I'm a Christian with Christian values. Jesus Christ on KFI once said that if he were a worker and he learned that his best friend on the job was an illegal alien, Jesus would turn him in. This struck an immediate alarm note with me. "What about the golden rule - -do unto others as you would have them do unto you". If I were a hard working alien with six kids and perhaps working overtime to send back money to my family and a good Catholic and attended mass every Sunday, I would feel betrayed if a Christian brother turned me in, in the name of the Lord. Dennis Prager has spoken of Micro verses Macro values in society, and that on the micro level we are to show compassion to our brother. Maybe I feel the state has the moral cradibility to bust an employer or something but I as a private citizen wouldn't feel right about doing it, because certain things are just the state's not and not for an individual.

Finally there is the whole bit about religion in politics. I readily admit to two contradictry truths. On one hand I agree with Thom Hartman and all those other people who say that religion has no place in the national politic or as a qualification for President. It's a private matter and any voter should ignore red hearing issues raised like "Do you really believe that Lucider was the brother of Jesus?" If I'm going to ask that one how about others such as the emaculate conception of either Mary or Jesus without original sin, or for that matter, original sin itself. I pretty much my own beliefs about what I believe the "Right" view of religion is in the previous posting. Among the "Rights" we are endowed with is the freedom to believe what we want to believe and pursue what we want to pursue, within lawful and moral limits. Lawful as far as the state is concerned and moral as far as your own contience is concerned. Having said this I didn't like the idea of Jack Kennedy repuliating his religion of Catholicisum like that or Romney doing the same thing with Mormonisum. If either is a "True Believer" they ought to from their own point of view Defend their Beliefs. It can be argued that an Athiest is the best thing to be in running for President because an Athiest can swear sole allegeence to his Country and not to his God. Every religion you can name makes you swear allegence to God first, and then country. I would not be this way. I'd swear to my country first and consider this oath "Sacred and undeniable". Yet all these religions want you to put "God" at the center of your life or "Christ" at the center of their lives. Since Jesus isn't here what this ammounts to is your swearing an oath to serve your Pastor as your appointed "Teacher" on earth to impart God's word and tell you what to think. As Gene Scott says "Of course we're brainwashed. At least if you're a member of my church you get to pick who is washing your brain". (Selah)

I'm running long in the tooth and getting these computer update messages to reboot so I better go. That phone call I got also delayed things. Again- - if we understood the sixth dimension I think we'd understand all the others with clarity. Remember that "Time is gravity" and gravity is time. So say Bruce Bushman, and the Federation, and Star Trek, and various writings I've read on the internet. Gravity-time have a known warping effect on space. But the psychic dimension also warps space. I think the sixth dimension is best understood with Gene Scott's waves on the beach analogy. It's easier to tell wave from wave than it is to tell where the wave leaves off and the ocean begins. The psychic dimension is "The whole picture" you don't see yet. As it says in the Bible "Now we see in a glass dimly what we shall see face to face".

Our Liberal Fasciest Friends

I had the wrong page up there. I had edit HTML. You know today we are so upset by the latest news from George Bush and this republican administration. We now hear that Newt says that "The CIA and the state department are out to get George Bush and this is why they issued that statement about Iran not having NUKES since 2003". They say the reason why Iran gave up the idea of getting nukes in 2003 is because we were bombing the hell out of Iraq in 2003 and they were afraid. So fear apparently works. That still doesn't explain why Bush lied about it and said they still were developing nukes in 2007. Now we hear that the CIA destroyed enhanced interrogation tapes of prisoners. Apparently this was fruitful torture that revealed many terrorist secrets. But I think Bush learned long ago that no matter what he does or says the democrats aren't going to do anything about other than continue to pass bills that further restrict our Civil Rights. But the thing is that a year from now this will all be water under the bridge. It will ammount to exactly nothing in the big scheme of things, other than as stepping stones for historians to look back at and say "at this juncture the American people decided they didn't care about their rights any more". Complaining about all this is like tryint to resserect the dead.

I'm leaning in a bit of a Ron Paul direction. Someone may ask me "Just of what religion are you?" My answer is different from people like Romney or Dennis Prager. Both Romney and Prager speak glowingly of some generic "Brand X religion" that the whole country should adopt. I disagree. My view of the Constitution is the view of Thomas Jefferson, and John Kennedy and Thom Hartman. Other people speak of certain rights that are granted or NOT granted under the Constitution. Jack Kennedy said that our rights come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. The same might be true of a person on welfare. His money in reality doesn't come from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God. Excuse me for that side trail. Thomas Jefferson said that human rights come from our Creator. Among these rights are the pursuit of happiness. And let me tell you; there are a lot of religions out there that interfere with my pursuit of happiness. Thom Hartman states that We the People formed this constitution. Therefore since We the People were endowed with all rights from the hand of God, we volentarily surrender up some of out perogatives to the comon good or "The Commons" as Hartman says. We contract with each other to form a government of the people, by the people and for the people. We believe in the rule of law, and insofar as the supreme court respects the rule of law, I'll respect it. Remembering that no man is above the law and no man is beneathe it. The Bible says "You shall not favor the rich man in his law suit; neither shall you favor the poor man in his suit". I think you have some kind of idea from these statements the sort of government in this country I consider ideal. But there are some with fasciest leanings that would extend government beyond its proper bounds. We have been wary of such people in the past.

A little history lesson. If you don't know the answer make your best guess. Answer all the questions before looking at the answers.

Who said it?

1) "We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good."

A. Karl Marx
B. Adolph Hitler
C. Joseph Stalin
D. None of the above

2) "It's time for a new beginning, for an end to government of the few, by the few, and for the few...... And to replace it with shared responsibility for shared prosperity."

A. Lenin
B. Mussolini
C. Idi Amin
D. None of the Above

3) "(We) ...can't just let business as usual go on, and that means something has to be taken away from some people."

A. Nikita Khrushev
B. Josef Goebbels
C. Boris Yeltsin
D. None of the above

4) "We have to build a political consensus and that requires people to give up a little bit of their own ... in order to create this common ground."

A. Mao Tse Dung
B. Hugo Chavez
C. Kim Jong Il
D. None of the above

5) "I certainly think the free-market has failed."

A. Karl Marx
B. Lenin
C. Molotov
D. None of the above

6) "I think it's time to send a clear message to what has become the most profitable sector in (the) entire economy that they are being watched."

A. Pinochet
B. Milosevic
C. Saddam Hussein
D. None of the above

Scroll down for answers

Answers

(1) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/29/2004
(2) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 5/29/2007
(3) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(4) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(5) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 6/4/2007
(6) D. None of the above. Statement was made by Hillary Clinton 9/2/2005

Be afraid, Be very afraid!

Mary Baker Eddy and the Reality of Evil

There's a rather interesting dialog I received in an E mail I'd like to relate. But before I relate it I'd like to refute it first. The premise of the thing is that cold is not real but only the absence of heat, just as hate is the absence of love and darkness is the absence of light. If the speaker thought about what he's saying for one second we have in our culture, Conventional Conversational Idioms. Like we speak of something being "run of the mill", we aren't talking about any actual mills. We speak of the sun rising but we know the sun doesn't rise. So when we speak of evil, we all know what me mean. Ron Hubbard and the Scientologists and the Hebrrew Bible take the opposite stance that Good means the absence of evil. Hence the "racial line" that bore Jesus Christ was qualified to do so according to Gene Scott and others because it LACKED any corruption of sin and was therefore perfect. Moreover Mary Baker Eddy has long been consitered a heritick by Walter Martin and other theologians on this very statement that sin and evil have no reality. Also the image of the drug addict comes up. The religious addicts who want "More of Jesus" all the time and "can't seem to get enough of Jesus". Are we to infer that each and every person in this country should become as fanatical as these extreme Christians? As to the idea about "I've never seen Jesus and I've never seen the inside of my brain either" is almost too nonsensical to comment on. Other scientists have seen brains and have disected them and know how they work. As to the idea of evolution, since the speaker (that is the Christian student) believed in absolute Calvinistic predestination in all things, HOW humans came to be is irrelivent, that is the process. The important point is THAT humans do exist and were always PREDESTINED to exist even before they did. Also you will note in the 'Problem of Evil" the student never resorts to talk of Free Will, because even this student knows it is logical bullshit. Having already allowed you to grade the paper before reading it, now you can read this discourse- - which will illustrate every phalocy I've talked about here.

We had some transcription problems. Word helped out a bit.
--------

A science professor begins his school year with a lecture to the students, "Let me explain the problem science has with religion." The atheist professor of philosophy pauses before his class and then asks one of his new students to stand.

"You're a Christian, aren't you, son?"

"Yes sir," the student says.

"So you believe in God?"

"Absolutely."

"Is God good?"

"Sure! God's good."

"Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?"

"Yes."

"Are you good or evil?"

"The Bible says I'm evil."

The professor grins knowingly. "Aha! The Bible!" He considers for a moment. "Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?"

"Yes sir, I would."

"So you're good...!"

"I wouldn't say that."

"But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't."

The student does not answer, so the professor continues. "He doesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Hmmm? Can you answer that one?"

The student remains silent.

"No, you can't, can you?" the professor says. He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax.

"Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?"

"Er...yes," the student says.

"Is Satan good?"

The student doesn't hesitate on this one. "No."

"Then where does Satan come from?"

The student falters. "From God"

"That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this world?"

"Yes, sir."

"Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?"

"Yes."

"So who created evil?" The professor continued, "If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil."

Again, the student has no answer. "Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?"

The student squirms on his feet. "Yes."

"So who created them?"

The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question. "Who created them?" There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. "Tell me," he continues onto another student. "Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?"

The student's voice betrays him and cracks. "Yes, professor, I do."

The old man stops pacing. "Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?"

"No sir. I've never seen Him."

"Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?"

"No, sir, I have not."

"Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?"

"No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't."

"Yet you still believe in him?"

"Yes."

"According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't exist. What do you say to that, son?"

"Nothing," the student replies. "I only have my faith."

"Yes, faith," the professor repeats. "And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence, only faith."

The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of His own. "Professor, is there such thing as heat?"

"Yes," the professor replies. "There's heat."

"And is there such a thing as cold?"

"Yes, son, there's cold too."

"No sir, there isn't."

The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain. "You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold'. We can hit up to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees."

"Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, cold is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it."

Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.

"What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?"

"Yes," the professor replies without hesitation. "What is night if it isn't darkness?"

"You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use to define the word."

"In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?"

The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester. "So what point are you making, young man?"

"Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed."

The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. "Flawed? Can you explain how?"

"You are working on the premise of duality," the student explains. "You argue that there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can't even explain a thought."

"It uses electricity and magnetism, but has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it."

"Now tell me, professor. Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?"

"If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes, of course I do."

"Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?"

The professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where the argument is going. A very good semester, indeed.

"Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?"

The class is in uproar. The student remains silent until the commotion has subsided.

"To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean."

The student looks around the room. "Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?" The class breaks out into laughter.

"Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain, felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir."

"So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures, sir?"

Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable.

Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. "I guess you'll have to take them on faith."

"Now, you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith exists with life," the student continues. "Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?"

Now uncertain, the professor responds, "Of course, there is. We see it everyday. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man. It is in the multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These manifestations are nothing else but evil."

To this th.e student replied, "Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light."

The professor sat down.


The student was Albert Einstein.


If you read it all the way through and had a smile on your face when you finished, repost =]

Thinking Like a Jew, and a Trojan

THE SECRET TO LIFE AFTER DEATH

AND THE ULTIMATE DESTINY OF PLANET EARTH

We congratulate you for finding this Blog, and hope you will tell all your friends. Greetings to all our Dardanian bretherin.

Test one, two, three… This morning I woke at 1:30 and rain was coming down and I was thinking of God and how my life was wasted, with so many disappointments. But I made a deal with God that if I didn’t solve how to change the date on the Google sky map within eight hours that I could ask of God anything I wanted. As it turned out when I looked at my watch it was 3:25 so I must have gotten some sleep in there somewhere. Of course this is “Jewish thinking” because it’s in the nature of a Jew to make deals with God, kind of like Gary always wants to “make a deal”. The Jew also sees God as someone who can interact with man and make deals with him, and even repent himself of some behavior he was previously going to engage in. After I had made this deal the rain was still falling and I went back to sleep and woke at 6:15, my usual time. But then at breakfast some revelations began flashing into my brain. It wasn’t exactly like a “transmission” from “somewhere else” like I sometimes get, it was more of just an “ah hah” moment of quiet revelation where I finally managed to fit all the pieces together of things that I previously knew. Let’s cover them now.

First of all we know that the Orion Federation is obsessed with genetics, not only of their own race but of so many other races, and even if there is inter-breeding among certain races, it’s done to exacting specifications. And there are things like the A and B markers and the 0 marker and the Reigellian immunity factor. (to Alcyonne) What came to me is that all these dead people I talk to such as Richi Vallenz, John Lennon, Dennis Wilson, Kurt Cobain, and Stewart Sutcliffe, are actually not the actual person who died but genetic clones done by the Federation to preserve their life. But once they are “brought back” they retain all their genetic memory of their brain that they had when they were alive, and that they can in fact add to their “life experiences” so that the people I talk to are not just “residual psychic plasma energy” that Sylvia Browne sometimes talks about but that it is an actual ongoing communication with the real person, or at least a genetic copy with all of the other person’s memories. Apparently they can do DNA from dead bones. Apparently they now have DNA proof that Jews did not come over to North America when the Book of Mormon claims. The Federation has claimed that not Jews but Egyptians came over here. I digress. Sylvia Browne often talks about a six month gap in time after the person died and when it’s possible to get in touch with them on “the other side”. Of course there is no “other side” but they live in the same four, or should be say five (1, 2, 3, 4, & 6^th dimensions) dimensional universe we do. But the other part of this revelation is that certain energy does posses a conscious will and awareness and that when you die you in fact go to the “Sea of Green”, which has been described as a continuous bad LSD trip. You don’t cease contiousness after you die, but at the same time you have no body and mo actual memories of who you once were or any means of preventing a quazi state of insanity from happening. It’s true that all life forms posses this “life force” or energy. This force has a will and consciousness but lacks memory and probability the ability to “learn” anything. This state might go on literally forever. But you cannot interact with this “plasma energy” force per se because it is incapable of learning anything and in fact does not exist in our time but rather that “sideways time” we spoke of, where eternity goes on forever. You may ask yourself “What happens then when a body is re-former with genetic material”? The fact is that it can be argued that the new Body “is not you”. The John Lennon I know who lives in Sirius A is not actually the John Lennon who died, but only a clone. John’s plasma energy is still out there somewhere from his old body and has this continuing consciousness or “sideways time”. The new clone may think it’s the old body but this is just an elaborate illusion. I talk about the sea of green because awareness does not end once you die, and if you think you’re going to find peace you have another think coming.

Some of you may ask “cam an ordinary person order a ghost of “plasma energy” out of a house? Not ordinarily. A person needs Superior spiritual authority from the sixth or psychic dimension to do this. Keep in mind this plasma energy is not conscious of our time or space even if to our way of thinking he occupies both time and space. If some action like an object moving takes place, it is more an accident than anything else, somewhat analgus to a baby rolling over for the first time. This plasma energy is incapable of learning but only of feeling, since it lacks any faculty, such as a brain, to learn or remember. People travel on the sixth dimension by space folding, much as you might do with a piece of paper folding it into a loop where the lower parts touch. The verticality is the sixth dimension. The paper itself is the three space dimensions. Often (if not usually) things appear backwards in a psychic revelation or travel, which may be how it got its name “the other side”. The amount of space traversed is immaterial. This phenominum is also known as “hyper-space” going “outside” the sheet of flat paper. When our Universe exploded into creation according to some- - there were no dimensions yet so every dimension had to be invented. With hyperspace, travel can be instantaneous. Revelations can be absolute. Often there are “portals” in the psychic dimension where “ghosts” are connected to superior Souls who superintend them.

Sylvia Browne said the world would end in 95 years or the year 2102. I disagree with this. We have several centuries left of Planet Earth. Of course there is going to be the great Warp force revolution of 2061 when even Newton predicted that gravity would be done away with. (His date was 2060) Once we learn about other cultures the Federation will gradually come to dominate and subjugate planet earth. But “the end” will not come in 2112. We have about six or seven centuries left, for earth as an independent planet to exist. This date alludes not to a year but is a right ascension hourly rating and it’s actually 21 hours and 12 minutes or 21.2 hours. This would mean that “The end” would occur when the sun crosses the vernal equinox on about February 11^th. Something significant happened with our family on Feburary 11^th. 1963 that makes this date easy to remember for me. (The next day was a holiday from school and the day dawned sunny) This is also the day the Beatles recorded eleven songs for their first album, ten of which were used. It is pointed out that Luprical is February 15^th. and we all know about that new Cave monument they discovered in Italy. But this isn’t a Romulan date but a Federation date. At this time, probably around the year 2700 AD, the Federation will take over planet earth. They say the Age of Aquarius came in 1910, which would have been 2200 on our calendar, which works backwards.

As you know someone on my maternal grandmother’s side of the family is a full blooded Cherokee. This gives me something in common with Jimi Hendrix, who has Cherokee blood. Of course Mark Germain and Lisa were having a debate about race and Lisa said that there WAS no such thing as “race” but only genetic markers. Really you can find more obvious links between me and Hendrix. We both have brown eyes and curly hair, fat lips, and melanin in our skin. We both have five fingers. You can laugh at this but geneticly I’ve heard the “dominant” trait for this gene is six fingers, but virtually nobody has it. In Bible times some Philistines had it. I believe this is too odd a trait to have been made up. The Ashkanazi Jews are not Jewish at all but descended Biblically from the son of Jepheth, the son of Noah. They are not Hebrew and aren’t even Semetic. On the other hand the Federation people claim to be genetically related to Zerah and Darda, or “Dardanus”, who are of the tribe of Judah through Tammar. These are the ancient Trojans and we have talked about this before. Mark Germain is correct in saying that “whether your mother was a Jew” is the key determining factor about your Jewishness. Of course in my writings I “think like a Jew” because I believe what Jesus of Nazereth started the Church finished in terms of screwing over the Jew. Apparently Orthodox Jews insist (?) that you have to be racially a Jew to be one of them.