Saturday, June 09, 2012

A Not so "Peppy" Pep Talk - -


There are so many pieces of the Sacred ceremony that you lack
Your head is filled with false ideas, twisted images, and distorted facts
- - - - - - - - -
Sometimes I find myself day-dreaming about the way things Really Are
But the way you get on my case, you make my ears ring, and you're making me see stars

Pardon me if my Stephanie Miller Memory quotient doesn't stray far from the Idiot rating.


In the news we have Romney and the tea baggers jumping all over the statement made by the President that the private sector is doing well.  According to the republican response the private sector continues to be “worried” about taxes that haven’t gone into effect yet.  We’ve been hearing this excuse for years and it’s wearing a little thin.  There is always this phantom, mystery tax in the future.  But in point of fact the recovery with the private sector is coming along quite well; it’s the public sector that’s the big problem and I’m not telling you anything you don’t know.  But they are comparing yesterday’s statement to John Mc Cain’s statement in September of 2008 that “The fundamentals of the economy are sound” in this continual “false equivalency” thing the right has been doing lately.  First of all if they are saying that John Mc Cain’s statement is way wrong- - which it certainly was- - tell me this.  How come all of you people still voted for him knowing what you did going in?  Of course one thing that will work against Romney, ironically is this thing about “Lowered expectations”.  Some might call it “evolving to a new sense of Normal”.  It was Jerry Brown who first used this “Lowered expectations” phrase, and none of us liked hearing it.  I sure didn’t.  Two days ago when I spoke of “lowered expectations” I was referring to a whole host of things including the “Promises of God” himself.  You see even God is telling us now we need to lower our sites. I guess God was high on communion wine when he dictated these sweeping Bible promises to the scripture writers and now desires not to be held accountable for his words.  And to use the “responsibility” argument on God- - Dr. Phil or anybody would say that if someone makes statements in your name and you well know about, and have the power to stop them from saying it, and you do absolutely nothing - - - then it’s none other than You who in the end accountable for the falsehood of the statement.  But I’d like to raise another issue now and this is the whole “straining at gnats” thing the tea party has routinely done with this President.  At least President Clinton actually WAS a “lying, pot smoking, draft dodging, womanizer”.  I didn’t dispute these things.  But I’m kind of wondering just what the “Driving force” or some might say “obsession” to find some Fault they can pin on this President.  To me it all goes back to race in the fact that the President is a Black man.  Judy sent me stuff about Rush Limbaugh discussing the adverse votes for the President in Kentucky, Arkansas, and West Virginia.  And Rush said “It would be wrong to say these anti Obama votes among Democrats are racist”.  Sure as that memory lady on Stephanie Miller sais “Sometimes we can remember things and see them as some historical oddity or anomally- - but definitely as just a part of our past and not a part of our present”.  I would like to now remind you of an insightful thing I heard from some evangelist maybe twenty years ago.  He said “We should classify a problem by time and how long it will take to be solved.  Is it a thirty minute problem or a five or six hour problem - - or a five or six day problem - - or is it a longer period, for instance a month - - or a year- - - of perhaps a lifetime?”  Fir instance when the LA Kings lost Wednesday’s ice hockey game, I knew we had at LEAST a three day “problem” and the odds are very good that it will turn into a five or six day “problem” before it gets “solved”.  Capish?  Many problems I have with my family are indeed lifetime problems.  If you’d asked me fifteen years ago whether racism in the South was “A thing of the Past” I would have said it was.  That it was long dead and buried.  But in the light of Travon Martin and other hate crimes recently- - - I would be proven wrong.  When you strain your brain trying to some up with some germ of rationalization for why the tea party behaves the way they two tword President Obama, in the end you’re left with what Mr. Spock says “Once you’ve eliminated every other possibilities, then whatever remains, no matter how improbable - - is The Truth”.  So it is with Racism, which clearly is not some anomally from my child hood fifty years ago but on ongoing, revived reality of today.  As to that Story I wrote about a nuclear war- - - in case the message didn’t quite get through Stewart Sutcliffe believes that Mitt Romney is attackable on the whole “going to War” issue, and that he will do almost anything- - nor to respond to danger, but to actually START a World War.  “Like Judas of old - - you lie and deceive.  A World War can be won - - You want me to Believe”.  This is from “Masters of War” by Bob Dylan.

While we're on the subject mf memory let's just review a few obvious facts about the timing of various political events.  Jimmy Carter was NOT responsible for the Reagan recession that actually began in ernest in July 1981 which is "indellibly etched into my memory" because I read Business Week in the public library so much back then.  Bill Clinton might possibly owe his eventual surplusses to the fact that George HW Bush "threw himself on a live political granade" by raising taxes in late 1990 that lost him the Tea Party vote but might have helped save the economy and certainly helped with the soaring budget deficets.  Also people used to always say that 9 - 11 was the Start of the George Bush recession.  This one can't be blamed in any way on Clinton.  But Bill Clinton can be held partially responsible for giving the Wall Street manipulators and crap shoot crowd a leg up in signing a host of bills late in his second presidential term.  However may I also remind you that George Bush by this time in 2004 had NOT created as many jobs from the "trough" of the 9 -11 recession, whenever you say it was in late 2001 or whenever - - -  as this President has in the past three years since the bottom of THIS recession in June of 2009.  This President has done well by the private sector and they really owe him a Lot.

No comments: