We continue to see the democrats forming a circular firing squad, shooting their own. Now Move On has come out against Scott McLellon saying he shouldn’t be appearing on these Sunday morning talk shows and that he’s not entitled to the profits of his book, as though he were a convicted felon or something. Today Scott said, I think generously, that he would donate a portion of his book’s profits to victims of the Mideast War. This whole thing in another Jewish metaphor could be likened to a Jewish General that was a brilliant tactician and conducted brilliant battle campaigns. But at the same time he allowed T shirts on cafĂ© press to be sold that had an unflattering depiction of some Jewish rabbi in the community nobody liked anyhow. And some would say “Because of this flaw, this man ought to step down as general”. “Meet the Press” continues to be hostile to Scott McLellon with questions that were so combative they didn’t give him a fair shot at actually being able to make a positive pitch for his book. On ABC the reception was somewhat more sympathetic. A Black woman said she liked “What Happened” because she got to see Mc Lellon’s thought processes and how he came to form the conclusions that he did. Another commentator stated that while it’s true Scott started off to write a pro Bush Adminestration book, that when you actually come to sit down and write out your thoughts step by step, different conclusions emerge. NBC had their fire coverage at Universal so I switched to ABC and picked up that first half hour later. The Hillary campaign has dug in their heels and won’t concede a thing, and Tuesday will be irrelivent. It’s pointed out that Mc Cain has come steadily up in the polls with independents and Obama’s numbers have come steadily down, with those same independent voters, so that now the lines are meeting. What Mc Lellon is doing is performing an invaluable service for the Democratic party in that he is giving them “talking points” for the fall campaign. If the independents knew Mc Cain’s lock-step voting record in the past seven years solidly with the President, they just might feel differently about him than they do. What people need to do is to quit flapping their gums and actually read the book, which I intend to do. Obviously once any person has actually read the book, they aren’t limited to these thirty second sound bites you hear.
We now come to the two big news items. Senator Obama has announced his resignation from his
The first hurricane has already hit the east coast of
. Johnny Wendell was on and once again we see the circular firing squad in force in the Democratic Part. I don’t get that. Wendell’s chief assertions were fundamentally false. He described McLellon’s book as a book by a coward and wrote it “when it no longer matters” and used terms such as “piling on” implying that our President is being put under too much pressure from the public and we need to ease up. That expression is so wrong on so many levels. The last time I checked Bush was still President. The Iraq War is still going on with no letup in sight. The democrats in congress are still hamstrung and can’t get anything done. The
There are people who are rats and cowards repenting of a deed when it no longer matters. One famous member of the head shrinker profession did pornographic nude photos of herself in the ‘seventies, and had sex with all sorts of men and loved every minute of her life. Now she’s a sixty plus year old menopausal woman who points the finger of shame at her callers for committing alledged sins only a fraction the severity of her own moral short-fallings. We all know about Charles Colson. How often people have said “It’s too bad that Colson didn’t get religion five or so years earlier before he did and spared us all a lot of heartache. If you were to resurrect Dad from the grave and he were to apologize for various things he’s said to me and attitudes he’d developed about me- - would Johnny Wendell say “It’s irrelevant now. You’re a coward. You should have done this fifteen or thirty years ago”. Do you think that Joan of Arc much cares from the grave that the Catholic Church finally “exonerated” her in the 1920’s? So I see Johnny Wendell’s point. When you take a particular action can be of key importance. It’s just that in this case Johnny is doing damage to the liberal cause in general by bashing Scott Mc Clellon, as if he were the most evil person Johnny could think of to vent his anger on, on today’s radio broadcast. How say you?
I’m going to re-sequence these paragraphs once I get them into a blog, so that they flow a little more naturally. I’m writing stuff right now as it’s on my mind. I would like to talk about the Jesus Christ show, which is doing and has done a credibility melt-down. Now Jesus is saying that he will accept “any callers that don’t have an agenda”. I’d like to define agenda, because to me it sounds like a code word for anyone who actually has organized their thoughts into something material to say. Jesus also said that the statement in Matthew 7 is not correct about “If you ask anything in my name I will grant it”, because this contradicts “the overall truth of the Bible, once you study it”. And he also said that “A denied prayer is always a teaching experience”. It would seem to me the first thing that is actually being “taught” is that the Word of God is a lie.
CMK Romulans have always told me that the strawberry was an especially celebrated fruit among their group. But apparently they weren’t referring to Romulans but rather the Scorsesian Reigellians, who have a strawberry festival.
Stewart Sutcliffe has dome something Christians never do and the Federation rarely has done in 25 plus years, and that is to apologize or retract something they said. As you may know three years ago Mal Evans called Stewart out on statements he made to me about the reality of the Fifth Dimension. Stewart today told me that he probably “overstepped his bounds and engaged in unwarranted speculation” when he made the remarks to me he did because “Fifth dimensional travel is only now in the experimental stage” and apparently not very far along at all. This is a big admission for anyone in the Federation that they aren’t omniscient, and don’t already have the answers to everything.
Finally I’d like to address this question of “Jesus the Egyptian”. As you know according to the knowledge the text writer had about this battle on the
No comments:
Post a Comment