We're soaring to new heights of audacity for this blog. But don't worry, we're covering Three Different Topics in this blog but the first one concerning Obama's death prediction by us, we have to "Set the stage for" with background info that you might find it hard to see the relivence of till you read it over a couple of times. People want to know whether the dead channel information to us or whether the great ones are as great on the famed "Other Side". Well a couple months back we did "Some Truths to Meditate On". This was the general period when we (I use the Royal "we') got on this kick about how Black Holes and Wormholes were nonsense and there was no place them in the reality of the Federation. There was a sub plot about how the general theory of gravity and accelerat-ING matter being the valid theory and the other theory perhaps there are aspects of it we'll let ride. Well, on one of my find tooth nets cast in the river to glean burried evidence- I came up with this physicist who died on April 13th. who was the champion of the Black Hole and also of the Wormhole, so StarTrek must have loved him. What we haven't said expressly about our Warp Power prediction of 2061 is that it all hedges on isolating either the graviton (another supposed Startrek invention that's real) and in general the whole idea that if we can invent anti-matter we can also make mince meat out of Albert Einstein's "speed limit" of the speed of light. It's possible that when you die you Find Out just WHICH of your theories are valid and which are "also rans". And of course the first thing you want to do is try to get a message back to earth to "clarify it" for all THOSE people. Why all this is relivent is I was looking for a person who died on or about this date that was an "Expander of the Envelope" of what we regard as Truth. I looked and I found. Another candidate was a President of Ireland who was in a sex scandle but I liked this guy better. WHAT DOES THIS ALL HAVE TO DO WITH OBAMA'S POLITICAL FORTUNES? Well, OK sometimes you got to look at the big picture. First of all I wanted to mention the Heisenburg Uncertainty Principle, which isn't at all what I thought THAT was. That one is really simple. You can know either an electron's momentum and mass, or else its location but you can't know both and one's accurecy with one aspects detracts from the other one with mathematical certainty. That tidbit was for free. But the greater truth is- - when you're looking at "pictures" you need to know the means of viewing it, because that determines what you see. In my means of viewing Obama's political fortunes I know there are flaws and limitations in my measurements. But just let me say that a date to watch with apprehension is JUNE TENTH of 2008. Probabilities are high on this date that a person- - a certain political candidate who is instrumental in the Liberal cause (do you know anybody like that?) will meet with sudden ill fortune with far reaching ramifications. What you want to know is "Is this preventable" and the answer is a big Negatori on that! I'm either right or I'm wrong and if I'm right the deed is inalterable. The liberal cause will be derailed and we will slide into more of the same trends we have been experiancing in Politics, only Worse!
Well you know about how they were going to have that fund raising convention for Mc Cain to be held at the Phoenix Convention Center. But they couldn't sell out the place and Mc Cain didn't want the media showing all those unsold seats on camera. Also it was mockingly stated that there would be more protestors outside in 110 degree heat than there would be on the inside in air conditioned confort. Also the whole idea of Mc Cain being seen with President Bush makes some uncomfortable. Well, I think Mc Cain has pretty much made his bed where Bush and the fabled Third Term is concerned, so now he can just lie in it. We will have a clear choice if it's Mc Cain and Obama. If Hillary is the candidate, it's a question of how far to the right she wants to go to pander to various voters. It's a little bit believable that Hillary has her own set of astrologers working on her probabilities of getting the better of Obama. Part of my own prediction has as a precurser sign of Hillary doing unexpectedly well in Puerto Rico to the extent she gets a lot of magazine write ups and her picture is on Time and Newsweek as "coming back from the dead".
TRYING TO 'GET ALONG' OR 'FLIES IN THE BUTTER MILK
You know there are times when I’d like to make a “fresh start” with my Christian faith but there seem to be just too many flies in the butter milk. For instrance many speak of Christianity as containing Puritan values and yet in one way and that is appealing to the “hard work” ethic, Calvary Christians fall short. C. S. Lewis declares that the least popular virtue in Christianity is chastity. I can think of others. I remember that line from Charriots of Fire where Abrams said “You expect us to accomplish our great feats with the effortlessness of Gods”. This is how Chuck Smith portrays the norm for Calvary Christians. Another “unpopular” virtue is humility. Another unpopular virtue is pacifism. A Christian pastor would rather have burning bamboo stuck in their finger nails than have to give up their preaching about the glories of War, particularly about the End Times. On the contrary “Chastity” is a very popular virtue. They use “lack of chastity” to weed out people from their church they never liked to begin with. But today I heard the ultimate in moral hypocricy. I always thought the Puritans held themselves to certain moral Christian standards. But there is a war the Puritans of 1634 waged on the Piquat tribe (?) where they raided a settlement apparently in the dead of night and set the tents ablaze and when the citizens came out to escape the flames they were shot one by one until they were all dead. The effect was close to genocidal. Austensively they did it to please another tribe whom the Piquat were at war with. But when this other tribe heard how the Piquat were just mowed down they broke off all diplomatic relations with the Puritans. It’s really the greatest of insults to say that Thanksgiving was about giving thanks to the Indians. They gave thanks to their God, their blood and war God.
You know what Bob Cummings in “Dial M For Murder” and Edward G Robinson of “Double Indemnity” have in common don’t you? They both “almost” solved a murder mystery but both lacked some key ingredient. To me the whole Life of Jesus thing is a great mystery. We all want to know what happened and every so often I uncover another “key ingredient” and update my recipe. We know the first spread both the Gospel and Gnosticism were from Egypt. (Not that the two were related) In our last posting we noted how there was actual talk of an Egyptian that attempted to make war on Rome from the Mount of Olives. What other clues can we uncover? The whole Judas thing makes a lot more sense if Judas was fingering an entire army of some six hundred rather than just one man. Also it has always been a question of “Who followed Jesus besides his twelve disciples?” Who was Simon the Zealot? What happened to the “multitudes of people” who shouted his praise on Palms Sunday? Here is another mystery. We know that “Jesus of Nazareth” could well be translated “Jesus the Branch” instead. But I just learned that Zealotism was labeled by some as “the fourth branch of Judaism” preceeded by the Saducees, Pharicees, Essines, and finally the Zealots. If it occurred on Passover it would be very unusual because everyone would be in their homes. It seems every where you go in the Passion Story people are up at all hours of the night and money deals were being made, which would profane a holy day. Also have you ever wondered why Jesus and his disciples never lodged in the city of Jerusalem but always lodged outside the city? Could it be that the disciples were ordered not to show their faces in Jerusalem “or else”. Perhaps Romans suspected an attack was imminent. Also we said last time that there was an eclipse of the sun the following day. How can this be used to “prove” anything. Simple. We KNOW there was a total eclipse but that totality ran not through Jerusalem (which was maybe 95%) but through Galilee. Now how could Jesus say “You shall be given no signs” if a total eclipse had occurred during Jesus’ ministry which typically concluded in 30 AD. This is an argument from reversal. Also the whole idea about Jesus being originally from Egypt is introduced by the Gospell itself. It places him in Egypt to validate the scripture “I called my son out of Egypt” If indeed Jesus had originally come from Egypt this scripture would make perfect sense. See the previous blog posting for more valuable hints and information on this controversial subject.
No comments:
Post a Comment