This photograph is a little bit of "circ de sulee". Scott Mc Lellon is out with a new book called "What Happened?" and says that the President ought to be prosecuted for Murder once he leaves office. There has been hints of this from others, including alledgedly Jimmy Carter, who advises President Bush not to leave the country once he leaves office, lest some foreign government pull a "Pinochet" on him and start prosecuting Bush for various crimes. Apparently the President had just received a CIA report that explicitly stated that Saddam Hussein was no threat to world peace. We've heard claims like this before. We've heard how the President expressly lied to the American people right after getting some intelligence report denying a threat by Iraq or Hussein. This time someone ordered that all references of express "getting Hussein off the hook" be excised from any report ever publicly released. Apparently Bush is a sociopath like O J Simpson. We you will remember they say O J Simpson was relaxed and smiling just before and just after he committed murders because "the murders gave O J a release from all the psychological pressure he was under". Vincent Bugliosi has stated that the President sleeps well at night and has no conscience about all the killing that has taken place. Bugliosi thinks the President ought to be prosecuted for the murders of our four thousand US troops plus the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Iraquis. The President was apparently ask whether the war was volitional and optional, or whether the coming War was one of dire necessity, and the President expressed puzzlement about the question and was unable to answer it. We know that before President Bush ever ran for office in 1979 he expressly said he was going to "not waste the political capital" but pursue the fight against Hussein. We know that the President expressly said in the campaign that he was against the exact type of wars he was waging, one of occupation and micro-managing a nation. To me I don't really know. Mc Lellon's book appears to be a "smoking gun", but we have so many smoking guns. We know that the UN inspectors were not allowed to do their job but the media gave the impression that Saddam was preventing them from doing their job. But in fact they WERE doing their job and had NOT found any weapons of mass destruction. This is all old information. But I guess it's time we acted on it. Now we hear that the President talked with some British diplomat in early 2003 about painting up a plane to look like a UN plane and flying it over Iraqi space, hoping that Hussein will fire on it, and this will provide the needed excuse for war.
We know how certain people are addicted to war. All these Christians who talk about the Rapture and a nucliar confrontation in Armageddon in Isrial, are closet war freaks, especially the ones who talk about the Rapture and how THEY won't even be in danger themselves because they are having "Dinner and a tournament" at the Supper of the Lamb. In my previous couple of postings I accuse the Christians of lying. I think this whole business of Jesus and Governor Pontious Pilate is sheer faborication. As you know the chief dialog is Jesus waying his kingdom is not of this world and has no designs that way. And that Pilate desperately wants to let him go a free man but the chief priests and the howeling mob are forcing Pilate's hand in the matter, but instead compelling Pilate to free a man who committed murder in a riot. We've heard as of late about the "seven level computer wipe" by our government. Churchmen have tried very hard to wipe out all record of the Truth. Their promogration of this basic lie against the Jews is something they have been desperate to achieve. How can Dennis Prager defend a religion that is at its core built on a lie? Is there any link to people will defend Bush's war policies and those who defend the voracity of the church? This is a major question, as I see it.
No comments:
Post a Comment